CurveBlock
Settlement finality means that once a transfer is settled it cannot be unwound; it is a legal and operational milestone. Traditional securities settlement relies on centralised systems such as real‑time gross settlement (RTGS) for cash leg finality and recognised central securities depositories for the asset leg. For tokenised shares, platforms must be explicit about whether transfers settle in central bank money, an account at a commercial bank, or an internal ledger. Each model has different risk characteristics.
If settlement relies on commercial bank accounts, investors bear the credit and operational risk of that bank. If settlement sits on a ledger that is not legally recognised as delivering finality, there can be legal uncertainty in insolvency scenarios. Central bank settlement reduces credit risk but is operationally and legally complex to integrate with novel token systems. That is why market operators and infrastructures discuss legal frameworks and technical arrangements to ensure finality for tokenised instruments.
Regulatory and supervisory bodies focus on ensuring that arrangements for settlement, custody and reconciliation meet established standards for financial market infrastructures, including resilience, recovery and orderly wind‑down. Clarity on where legal title and finality occur is essential for custody separation, client protections and resolving disputes.
Retail investors considering fractional digital shares should ask platforms where settlement finality is achieved, whether cash settles in central bank money or commercial bank balances, and how their claims are protected if a provider fails—because these details materially affect counterparty and systemic risk.