CurveBlock
Listed REITs provide exposure to commercial real estate through shares traded on public markets. They offer liquidity relative to direct property ownership and are subject to corporate governance and tax rules specific to REIT status, including distributions and qualifying income tests. Unlisted property funds and unit trusts (including OEICs) invest directly in property but are typically less liquid; they often use periodic dealing windows and may impose gates during stressed markets. Closed-ended funds and property companies can hold illiquid or specialist assets without redemption pressure, but share prices may trade at a premium or discount to NAV.
Crowdfunding and equity platforms allow direct fractional ownership of specific properties or SPVs. These models can reduce minimum ticket sizes and give access to development or niche sectors, but they concentrate project-specific risk and depend heavily on platform due diligence, trustee arrangements and the legal form of the investor interest. Important differences across vehicles include valuation frequency (daily NAV for listed products vs quarterly or event-based for unlisted vehicles), independent administration, auditor coverage and oversight by trustees or depositaries.
For retail investors, the trade-offs are clear: listed REITs give immediacy and transparency but less control over asset selection; unlisted funds and closed-ended vehicles may offer access to institutional strategies but with liquidity constraints; crowdfunding and tokenised shares lower minimums but require scrutiny of governance, exit mechanisms and service providers. Understanding these structural differences is essential when considering fractional digital share offerings that replicate or combine these models.